Added Value or Essential Instruction?: Librarians in the Twenty-First-Century Classroom
Abstract
In recent years, we have seen a proliferation of the amounts of information that we’re exposed to, and our ability to critically navigate that information hasn’t kept pace with the speed at which it’s coming at us. As information professionals we must ask ourselves—what is our role in helping students and patrons navigate information? What value can we add in a world where information is increasingly complex, contradictory, and competitive? Are our traditional methods of delivering information literacy enough? This paper looks at the evolution of information literacy instruction from the skills in the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) through the newly adopted Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (2016), using examples from my own experience as a reference and teaching librarian. I will focus on how the ways in which we reach students has changed—from one-shot information literacy sessions to more in-depth interactions with students under the new Framework. I will argue, ultimately, that to truly serve students in our current information age, librarians must consider moving even deeper into the classroom, developing and teaching information literacy and critical thinking skills for credit in the college and university setting, and I will highlight a course I developed at my own institution.
How will this change what we do in the classroom?
References
Stanford History Research Group, Executive Summary: Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning, (Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2017), 4, https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:fv751yt5934/SHEG%20Evaluating%20Information%20Online.pdf.
Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, Association of College and Research Libraries (Chicago: American Library Association, approved January 18, 2000), 2, https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/7668 (hereafter cited as Standards).
Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, Association of College and Research Libraries (Chicago: American Library Association, adopted January 16, 2016), 2, http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (hereafter cited as Framework).
Rebecca Z. Kuglitsch, “Teaching for Transfer: Reconciling the Framework with Disciplinary Information Literacy,” portal: Libraries and the Academy 15, no. 3 (2015): 459, https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0040.
Colleen Burgess, “Teaching Students, Not Standards: The New ACRL Information Literacy Framework and Threshold Crossings for Instructors,” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 10, no. 1 (2015): 1–6, https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3440.
Allison Fullard, “Using the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy to Foster Teaching and Learning Partnerships,” South Africa Journal of Libraries & Information Science 82, no. 2 (2016): 46–56, https://doi.org/10.7553/82-2-1627.
Rachel Scott, “Part 2. If We Frame It, They Will Respond: Student Responses to the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” The Reference Librarian 58, no. 1 (2017): 19–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2016.1196471.
Christine Bombaro, “The Framework Is Elitist,” Reference Services Review 44, no. 4 (2016): 552–63, https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-08-2016-0052.
Dorothy A. Mays, “Using ACRL’s Framework to Support the Evolving Needs of Today’s College Students,” College & Undergraduate Libraries 23, no. 4 (2016): 356, https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2015.1068720.
Paul L. Hrycaj, “An Analysis of Online Syllabi for Credit-Bearing Library Skills Courses,” College & Research Libraries 67, no. 6 (2016): 535.
Rachael E. Elrod, Elise D. Wallace, and Cecelia B. Sirigos, “Teaching Information Literacy: A Review of 100 Syllabi,” The Southeastern Librarian 60, no. 3 (2012): 8–15, http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/seln/vol60/iss3/4.
Mimi O’Malley, “Information Literacy Grown Up: One-Shot Instruction to Credit-Bearing Course,” Kentucky Libraries 73, no. 4 (2009): 16.
Margaret Burke, “Academic Libraries and the Credit-Bearing Class: A Practical Approach,” Communications in Information Literacy 5, no. 2 (2012): 156–73, eduscapes.com/instruction/articles/burke.pdf.
Vilve Seiler, Kärt Miil, and Krista Lepik, “How to Fit Teaching of Information Literacy in with Students’ Needs: An On-line Credit Course Model from the University of Tartu Library,” Liber Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2012): 42–63, https://www.liberquarterly.eu/articles/10.18352/lq.8040/.
Judith Faust, “Teaching Information Literacy in 50 Minutes a Week: The CSUH Experience,” Journal of Southern Academic and Special Librarianship 21, no. 3 (2001), http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v02n03/faust_j01.htm.
Carol A. Powell and Emily C. Ginier, “Lessons Learned: Year-by-Year Improvement of a Required Information Competency Course,” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 32, no. 3 (2013): 290–313, https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.806862.
Ian Beilin and Anne E. Leonard, “Teaching the Skills to Question: A Credit-Course Approach to Critical Information Literacy,” in “Libraries, Information, and the Right to the City: Proceedings of the 2013 LACUNY Institute,” special issue, Urban Library Journal 19, no. 1 (2013): 1–10, http://academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol19/iss1/10.
Erin L. Davis, Kacy Lundstrom, and Pamela N. Martin, “Librarian Perceptions and Information Literacy Models,” Reference Services Review 39, no. 4 (2011): 686–702, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321111186695.
Jennifer Mayer and Melissa Bowles-Terry, “Engagement and Assessment in a Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Course,” Reference Services Review 41, no. 1 (2013): 62–79, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321311300884.
Susan Ariew, “How We Got Here: A Historical Look at the Academic Teaching Library and the Role of the Teaching Librarian,” Communications in Information Literacy 8, no. 2 (2014): 208–24, http://www.comminfolit.org/index.php?journal=cil&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=v8i2p208.
Jane Kemp, “Isn’t Being a Librarian Enough?,” College & Undergraduate Libraries 13, no. 3 (2006): 5, https://doi.org/10.1300/J106v13n03_02.
“Introducing IMVAIN,” Center for News Literacy, accessed February 22, 2018, http://drc.centerfornewsliteracy.org/content/introducing-imvain.
“All Topics,” On the Media, accessed February 22, 2018, https://www.wnyc.org/topics.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.57.4.6706
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© 2023 RUSA